Appendix Five: Pressure Ulcer Pathway
1 Aim of Protocol and Introduction
The government’s statement on safeguarding (2013) advises that distinctions need to be drawn between where there are concerns about the quality of the service provided and where there are safeguarding concerns.
This is a multi-agency protocol which aims to support decisions about appropriate responses to pressure ulcer care. It provides guidance for staff in all sectors who are concerned that a pressure ulcer may have arisen as a result of poor practice, abuse, neglect or act of omission and therefore have to decide whether to make a safeguarding referral into the Local Authority. A pathway and flow diagram outlining the key elements of the protocol can be found in Appendix 4.1 and 4.2.
From a governance perspective, each organisation will be responsible for ensuring that the protocol is used appropriately and monitor and review the use of the protocol.
Neglect is a form of abuse which involves the deliberate withholding OR unintentional failure to provide appropriate and adequate care and support where this has resulted in, or is highly likely to result in, significant preventable skin damage.
Skin damage has a number of causes, some relating to the individual person, such as poor medical condition and others relating to external factors such as poor care, ineffective Multi-Disciplinary Team working, lack of appropriate resources, including equipment and staffing. It is recognised that not all skin damage can be prevented and therefore the risk factors in each case should be reviewed on an individual basis before a safeguarding referral is considered. All cases of actual or suspected neglect should be referred through the safeguarding procedures.
Cases of single category 1 or 2 must be considered as requiring early intervention to prevent further damage. If there are concerns regarding poor practice, an appropriate escalation must be considered, i.e. raising a clinical incident.
The person should be referred to Safeguarding through local arrangements if there is:
- Significant damage i.e. category 3 or 4, unstageable ulceration or multiple category 2, and
- There are reasonable grounds to suspect it was preventable, or
- Inadequate measures were taken to prevent development of pressure ulcer, or
- Inadequate evidence to demonstrate the above.
Significant skin damage in the case of a pressure ulcer is indicated by two or more pressure ulcers of category 2 or 1 or more category 3 or 4, as defined by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) classification system.
This protocol should be applied to pressure ulcers reported by anyone including carers, relatives and patients, as any tissue damage, no matter who reports it, should be investigated.
Where concerns are raised regarding skin damage there is a need to decide whether a safeguarding referral might be indicated as well as completing a clinical incident form. A person's consent should be attempted and information should also be gathered from family and patient to obtain a history of the problem. It is good practice to contact former care providers for information if the person’s care has recently been transferred, and seek clarification about the cause of the damage.
Any category 2 and above pressure ulcer MUST be reported as a clinical incident according to local clinical governance procedures. There are also requirements for providers to report category 3 or 4 to the appropriate governing body, CCG (for NHS) and CQC (for care homes). Please check the criteria for reporting and learning for your own organisations.
Any category 3 or 4 pressure ulcer identified within 72 hours of admission to a unit or service must be escalated and reported to the previous care provider as a clinical incident.
Staff should also refer to:
- Their own organisation's policies and procedures on pressure ulcers.
- Other relevant local and national guidelines, protocols and policies, e.g. NICE Guidance, incident reporting policies.
2 Assessment Guidance
The following provides guidance on whether to refer as a safeguarding concern.
Assessment of the wound and completion of the decision guide must be completed by the first qualified member of staff who is a practicing registered nurse (RN), with experience in wound management. This does not have to be a Tissue Viability Nurse.
The outcome of the decision guide must be documented on the report form in Appendix 4.3 (or other locally agreed referral form). If further advice/support is needed with regards to making the decision to refer to the local authority, the Safeguarding Adults Lead within the Local Authority or provider organisation should be contacted.
The safeguarding decision guide should be completed immediately or as soon as reasonably possible following identification of the pressure ulcer of concern. In exceptional circumstances this timescale may be extended but the reasons for extension must be documented.
Where the patient has been transferred into the care of the organisation with significant skin damage it may not be possible to complete the decision guide without additional information. The decision guide in appendix 4.3a should be completed for all inherited and developed pressure ulcers. As far as is reasonably possible, contact should be made with the transferring organisation to ascertain if the decision guide has been completed and if not, it should be completed jointly or an agreement made about which agency should complete it. In the event of this not being agreed, a referral to safeguarding should be made to assess any unmet need or for the local authority /social care to obtain a provider's response.
Following this, a decision should be made whether to make a safeguarding referral to the local authority in line with local referral arrangements.
Where a decision is made to refer, the Safeguarding Team should request that the provider completes a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) or provide a response record to support the care and treatment decision making to evidence good safe appropriate care. In cases where the reported concern is from a third party the RCA/ report should be completed by the provider where the concern has allegedly occurred and the provider responsible for care at that time. Guidance on what the RCA should consider is available in Appendix 5.5. This should be completed by a Senior Manager at the provider such as, Ward Manager or Residential/Nursing Home manager.
In cases open to District Nursing Services or NHS Hospitals the development of a category 3 or 4 will trigger the Serious Incident Requiring Investigation (SIRI) process in line with the local policies e.g. pressure ulcer or risk management policies.
SIRI processes will only look at the care delivered by NHS service; if the individual was receiving additional care through a residential or private homecare provider they should provide their own report/ RCA at the request of the LA under safeguarding. 2.10 The local authority
The local authority need to decide/agree post Root Cause Analysis/SIRI, if a full Strategy Meeting or virtual (telephone) Strategy Meeting needs to be convened to agree findings, decide on safeguarding outcome and any actions.
3 Initial history taking and safeguarding decision guide completion
The assessment must consider six key questions which together indicate a safeguarding decision guide score. Appendix 4.3 below to record your score and decision. A downloadable version is available here.
The threshold for referral is 15 or above. However this should not replace professional judgement. This score should be used to help inform decision making regarding escalation of safeguarding concerns related to the potential of neglectful care/management resulting in the pressure ulceration.
It is not a tool to risk assess for the development of pressure damage.
Consent for photographic evidence needs to be sought in line with local policy. Photographic evidence to support the report needs to be provided wherever possible.
Photographic evidence is best practice, however in its absence, body maps must be used to record skin damage and can be used as evidence if necessary at a later date. If two workers observed the skin damage they must both sign a body map (Appendix 4.4)
When the protocol has been completed even when there is no indication that a safeguarding alert needs to be raised, the tool should be stored in the patient’s notes.
Decision Pathway – Pressure Ulcers and Safeguarding Adults - click here
Decision flow chart – When to refer to Safeguarding Adult Procedures - click here
Adult Safeguarding Decision Guide for patients with pressure ulcers. If the score is 15 or over refer to Safeguarding by sending this form with your safeguarding referral - click here.
Appendix 4.4: Body map
Body maps must be used to record skin damage and can be applied as evidence if necessary at a later date. If two workers observed the skin damage they should both sign the body map. For the body map form - click here
Appendix 4.5: Guidance for use in root cause analysis
- Include any factors associated with the person's behaviour that should be taken into consideration
- Does the person have a Long Term condition which may impact on skin integrity; such as Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Is the person receiving palliative care?
- Does the person have any mental health problems or cognitive impairment which might impact on skin integrity? e.g. dementia / depression.
Monitoring of skin integrity
- Were there any barriers to monitoring or providing care e.g. access or domestic/social arrangements?
- Should the illness, behaviour or disability of the person have reasonably required the monitoring of their skin integrity (where no monitoring has taken place prior to skin damage occurring)?
- Did the person refuse monitoring? If so, did the person have the mental capacity to refuse such monitoring?
- Were any further measures taken to assist understanding e.g. patient information, leaflets given, escalation to clinical specialist, ward leads, team leader, and senior nurses?
- If monitoring was agreed, was the frequency of monitoring appropriate for the condition as presented at the time?
Expert advice on skin integrity
- Was appropriate assistance sought? e.g. professional advice from a Community Nurse Clinical Lead or Tissue Viability Specialist Nurse
- Was advice provided? If so, was it followed?
Care planning & implementation for management of skin integrity
- Was a pressure ulcer risk assessment carried out and reviewed at appropriate intervals?
- If expert advice was provided did this inform the care plan?
- Were all of the actions on the care plan implemented? If not, what were the reasons for not adhering to the care plan? Were these documented?
- NB: If the person has been assessed as lacking capacity to consent to the care plan, has a best interest decision been made and care delivered in their best interests?
- Did the care plan include provision of specialist equipment?
- Was the specialist equipment provided in a timely manner?
- Was the specialist equipment used appropriately?
- Was the care plan revised within appropriate time scales?
Care provided in general (hygiene, continence, hydration, nutrition, medications)
- Does the person have continence problems? If so are they being managed?
- Are skin hygiene needs being met? (including hair, nails and shaving)
- Has there been a deterioration in physical appearance?
- Are oral health care needs being met?
- Does the person look emaciated or dehydrated?
- Is there evidence of intake monitoring (food and fluids)?
- Has patient lost weight recently? If so, is person's weight being monitored?
- Are they receiving sedation? If so is the frequency and level of sedation appropriate?
- Do they have pain? If so has it been assessed? Is it being managed appropriately?
Other possible contributory factors
- Has there been a recent change (or changes) in care setting?
- Is there a history of falls? If so has this caused skin damage? Has the person been on the floor for extended periods?
This protocol has been developed with reference to:
Newcastle Safeguarding Adults Board: Safeguarding Adults and Skin Damage Protocol: Deciding whether to refer to the Newcastle Safeguarding Adults Procedures (23 April 2009) Lewisham Primary Care Trust, London Borough of Lewisham , University Hospital Lewisham. Joint Protocol for Determining Neglect in the Development of a Pressure Ulcer(30 November 2007)
Lewisham Primary Care Trust, London Borough of Lewisham , University Hospital Lewisham. Joint Protocol for Determining Neglect in the Development of a Pressure Ulcer(30 November 2007)
Lambeth and Southwark Safeguarding Adults Partnership Boards: Safeguarding Adults and Skin Damage Protocol: Deciding whether to refer to the Safeguarding Adults Procedures Acute Trusts Subgroup (September 2009)
Department of Health (2003) Essence of care service user focused benchmarks for clinical governance April 2003
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2005) Guidance for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers September 2005
Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice” Accessible online:
European pressure ulcer advisory panel Pressure Ulcer Treatment Guidelines (2014 http://www.epuap.org/gltreatment.html
Skin Changes at Life’s End: Final Consensus Statement http://www.epuap.org/gltreatment.html
Reviewed by Pan Berkshire Policy and Procedure Group - May 2019